You must log in or register to comment.
- 7 days
Good old ReLU. I’ve heard that CNN’s perform better when using ReLU as the activation func, and that’s probably why; ReLU acts as a filter on the image’s features.
- 7 days
Nah. Without a nonlinearity you just get a linear combination of inputs instead of the output of a deep neural network. ReLU or Ramp is just the simplest possible non linearity. Using a simple function can enable using deeper networks yielding even better performance.
It’s actually somewhat of a headache, numerically. Works well enough tho.
- 7 days
Had one guy asking if AI is conscious. I said the whole thing is actually one very big excel sheet, so does he think that excel can be conscious? Anyway, I think the guy is now in a relationship with office.
- 7 days
Yes, it is inherently incorrect, I just think that increases the fun factor. It reminds me of that guy who wrote a prime-checker for his thesis and it was just a massive list of if-statement
- nop@lemmy.worldEnglish7 days
Boolean math let’s you convert it all to nand gates. For ease of manufacturing this is what is done.
- 7 days
Matrix multiplication, activation functions and softmax. Also some matrix addition sometimes. That’s literally it
I mean yeah, the mechanism itself is straightforward, but isn’t a big thing that we don’t really know what it chooses for its… basis vectors? Something. Like that, I don’t do programming and I’m out of practice with matrices
The brain isn’t meat, it’s fat, and is known to turn to soap under the right conditions. Which coincidentally also explains the soapy tiddy memes.
- 6 days
The brain can turn into soap? Did it still work after? Can soap think?
- 7 days
That was old AI.
New AI uses a complex, multi-layer sequence of Magic 8-balls.
- 7 days
That’s a common misconception. It is a complex multi-layer sequence of heavily biased Magic 8-balls.
“Mirror mirror on the wall please fix my awful code, make no mistakes”
- 6 days
I wouldn’t be surprised if some stuff (as in architecture) was solved by querying a different model to solve a problem
- 6 days
I would be heavily more inclined to use LLMs (and also probably use it in a more correct manner) if it came in the physical form of a magic 8-ball that I would violently shake to get the answer.
- 7 days
You don’t have to be an AI developer to not understand your code. I not understand my code every day.
You’re forgetting the activation function to break linearity, otherwise you can only model linear trends. Many activation functions have “if” hidden in them (e.g. ReLU with the “max”).
- Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.appEnglish7 days
Have you ever tried to follow five hundred nested for loop and if statements? Shit is nuts…
Oh, just wait till you hit that sweet sweet python “Everything can have an
elseblock”if some_shit: try: for stuff in thing: if stuff is bad: raise ShitHitTheFanError # Massive block comment do = the_thing() if do is good: break else: do = the_other_thing() if not a_thing: help_me() # May raise NoHelpFoundError except ShitHitTheFanError: my_life = recover() if my_life is bad: for fuck in my_life: try: fix(fuck) except NoHelpFoundError: break else: fuck_this_shit() else: wat_is_going_on() else: theres_another_one("?")- Big_Boss_77@fedinsfw.appEnglish6 days
I’m a network engineer lol python is all I know… and yup, the else is a curve ball from hell
But this is absolutely fucking hilarious
Conway’s Game of Life is Turing Complete and that fact has been fucking with my mind for like 25 years.
- 6 days
ml is not a hard coded set of if-else pairs. it’s a glorified fit with a lot of parameters.
- 6 days
If this is true then everything is fine.
Edit: Damn, I’m part of the problem, right?
- 6 days
I mean, without if statements and loops theres no logic? It would only be flat code, so i mean… Yeah?
- renormalizer@feddit.orgDeutsch6 days
All you need for Turing completeness is finite precision floating-point operations and an infinite loop.
