You must log in or register to comment.
“bUt tHeRe’S lAwS aGaInSt iT!”
I suppose it needs to be said so people known it’d be breaking the law. But that cry isn’t stopping them from doing literally anything that they’ve been doing.
- 8 days
did he not get the memo that we’re a fascist state now? written laws are meaningless when no one enforces them, so “the law” becomes whatever tf dear leader wants it to be.
see: 1984
- 8 days
It’s not right but I’m not afraid of national guard standing in front of a ballot box.
ICE? They’re unhinged with no accountability, seeming eager to murder the American people for little to no provocation.
- 6 days
It’s not right but I’m not afraid of national guard standing in front of a ballot box.
Then this isn’t for you, is it?
- 8 days
They’re trained. And they probably don’t want to be there.
ICE is untrained and very eager.
Given a choice, which would you prefer?
But yes, shit can always go sideways with this admin. They give zero fucks for We The People.
- katiecakes@lemmy.blahaj.zonedeleted by creator6 days
The national guard were the ones roaming cities during BLM protests, in armoured vehicles, shooting random civilians on their porches with less lethal ammunition.
- 8 days
They’re trained. And they probably don’t want to be there.
I like your optimism and wish I could share it, but that is very unit and personnel dependent and on a large gradient of quality.
- ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldEnglish8 days
Kent State took place at a peaceful protest, a rally protesting the expansion of the Vietnam war.
A ballot box is not a group of people falsely deemed to be a terrorist threat. It’s just a box. And no order to shoot would be followed by any real Guardsman.
Sounds like you just want people to be afraid to vote, and this event is pure theater conducted by this administration to try to achieve just that. Trump wants people to be too afraid to vote. Stop helping Trump.
No one I know is buying that shit, and no NG I personally know (I’ve been friends with many and kept up with a few) would do more than just stand there. National Guard is not ICE.
Stop making like a NG shooting at a fifty-six year old protest at the height of the Vietnam War, and a group of peaceful NGs standing at a ballot box, are the same thing or even similar. They are not.
- 8 days
Excuse me? You can’t even legally wear cammo in other countries because of its intimidating nature. Glad to hear your not afraid of the oppression, I guess.
- vorpuni@tarte.nuage-libre.frFrançais8 days
Made me look it up. What the fuck. I guess it’s good to know in case you travel with surplus to wear outdoors.
- 8 days
The first few hundred national guardsmen that storm the Whitehouse and TCB will be American legends, and will probably never have to lift a finger for the rest of their lives
- 8 days
Step into booth, check first box for Democrat
National Guard: (shifts gun in his hands) hmmm… No. Try again.
Check box for independent candidate
National Guard: (inspecting gun) closer… Try again
Checks box for Republican.
National Guard: You’re a true Patriot!™©® Thanks for taking the time to vote!
- 8 days
Yeah I can see that but realistically the goal is more likely to terrorize brown skinned people from voting.
Thats even their excuse, that they’re preventing undocumented immigrants from voting. Too bad that’s almost non-existent plus you can’t tell by the color of peoples skin
- 5 days
Yes you can, if brown/minority then they obviously llegal
Tap for spoiler
Being sarcastic if it went over your head. but I am quite worried that will actually be their metric
This excuse may not have worked for the Nazis in the end, but who is gonna Nuremberg trials the Americans? Nobody. There will never be justice.
Thats the same excuse ww2 German soldiers used, “I know its wrong to boil jew children and make soap out of them but o’ well, orders are orders haha lolkbye”
🙄 Pathetic
- 8 days
Yeah. That was the intended reference but didn’t think it needed further explanation
But basically the joined result of the trials was that orders can’t justify crime but in some cases make the punishment milder
- moakley@lemmy.worldEnglish8 days
I think most people know “just following orders” refers to Nazis. It’s a meme in the oldest sense: a shared cultural memory. It’s literally referred to as “the Nuremberg defense”.
- GreyEyedGhost@piefed.caEnglish8 days
Land of the indentured would be more fitting for a play on the original.
No bigger pussy than the one calling other people names from the safety of their home.
- 8 days
Anyone encountering this when they go to vote should call 911 to report voter intimidation.
- ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldEnglish8 days
Exactly. It’s not just illegal in federal law, but also codified in state laws. Armed law enforcement is absolutely verboten within a certain radius of voting sites. Several states have already announced plans about countering the voter interference they fully expect to have to deal with.
Anyone concerned should also look up their local laws to be sure. Here’s another article with straightforward information about what the real situation is on the ground in general for those interested. From that article:
If a voter sees armed officials at a polling place, they should alert the election officials at the polling place right away. Election officials have specific procedures to follow to report the situation and have it appropriately handled in an efficient manner.
This robber administration is desperate. The orange chancre doesn’t want to go to prison. But most of us don’t have to wait for Election Day and we can vote by mail, absentee ballot, ballot drop-off box, and early voting right now.
He’s trying to make people scared to vote with this kind of theater, but there’s no reason to be. We just have to be wise, educated, and willing to look out for each other.
- 6 days
If a voter sees armed officials at a polling place, they should alert the election officials at the polling place right away.
But what if it’s a drop box, where there is no polling official? I live in Washington, and many or most people here use unattended drop boxes.
- ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldEnglish6 days
That sounds like a great opportunity to find out what your local laws are and what the governor’s office and your secretary of state are planning to do about it.
Your own state Attorney General just contributed an article to The Guardian the other day about how seriously they are taking all the threats against your right to have a free and fair election in Washington state. If I were a citizen there I’d give them a call myself: they have almost certainly been thinking about the same thing you are.
Also take note of headcount.org, which is a volunteer, non-data collecting site that a number of younger people are using to get the vote out. While it does not address your specific question, it’s a great place to start for voting laws in a specific state.
If you find something out, would you mind posting it? I’d sure like to know, and I bet others would too.
- ChunkMcHorkle@lemmy.worldEnglish7 days
It’s a federal district. Technically, it is governed by its mayor and Congress. While it is not a state, it does have local law and is of course subject to the multiple federal laws governing what law enforcement can take place at polling sites.
