black people, immigrants, and indigenous people too. atp, to stop the constant social murder and actual murder, we’ve got to force it on people. I don’t want to become radicalized and lose my life or some shit fighting against the state, but if they’re just letting people get lynched again, then I have to.
The above image really did happen to me, though.
Men benefit from it. They benefit both from raping people with impunity and from being one of the good ones who doesn’t.
Literally do not care if they weren’t popular or didn’t have elections. It was necessary that they suppressed the SRs, because democratic socialists are idealists who will run you into the ground. The majority of Russians were antisemitic, does that mean that’s just fine?
The DSA cannot at all be compared to the groups I was talking about because they fail at one of the main requirements, to be an anti-imperialist movement, their candidates have like backed out from every meaningful thing. They are not really “democratic socialists” they are closer to social democrats.
I thought you were talking about some mythical social democrats or something, based on your language and talking about votes in European countries. My brain turned off after I read the words oligarchic corpocracy. I thought you were a garden variety rad-lib. First person I’ve known who supports the SRs it didn’t even register in my brain.
Nobody is gonna get this reference, are they?
You don’t have to be mentally ill to be religious. Some people just grew up with it and see it as their reality, and some people adopted it. Most religious people are not more or less mentally ill than the average religious none or atheist.
The Socialist Revolutionary Party, the ones who supported the provisional government originally? And who supported the white army? I didn’t think it was possible anyone supported them in 2026.
That link is broken on my browser.
The words “purity tests” sets off my liberal detector, because of accusations of “purity testing” being used to defend Democratic party entryism and terrible DSA candidates from criticism.
Someone agrees with me? That’s cool. I thought all of that was going to be for naught.
I don’t think Marx ever condemned the word “authoritarian.” Or said anything about a dictatorship of the proletariat becoming more unjust than a dictatorship of the bourgeoisie. That doesn’t sound like anything he’d say.
What is “socialist consensus?” What are these words? “Oligarchic corpocracy?” “Social Revolutionaries?” Are you talking about the Mensheviks? Is this some kind of social democratic stroke?
I don’t think cPTSD is specifically people who dissociate. It’s a bunch of different stuff.
Despite how I described it, at worst it really feels more like a mental illness, that genuinely causes me problems and at best it’s like a super advanced coping mechanism, and sometimes it really feels like I’m bullshititing people about it.
Although, it does have a weird connection with my gender I can’t entirely explain.
Imagine the reactions you’d get from other people if you said this in real life. Accusing other people of like having a psychosexual fixation with being dominated and that’s why they have their political beliefs is such a strange thing to say. You’ve made it unclear if it’s a joke, but I don’t really care.
“We should be free of their pathetic attempt to get the parental figure they lacked in their formative years.”
Why do you have to degrade people with childhood trauma to make this analogy?
No, Signalis Replikas.