While you’re correct, that much heat emitted in a local area prone to yearly fire seasons seems to be unwise. If sparks from trains travelling around curves can start fires (Lytton seemingly every year), multiple nukes’ worth of heat daily might be worse.

Also, it’s still an increase of emissions, more is always worse than neutral in this scenario. Yes, there are more polluting things to worry about, but we need to be reducing emissions, not increasing them.

Good thing we’re not dealing with a existential crisis caused by heating the earth, or anything…

Good article. Do you remove it completely and not replace, even if they lose what little benefits the act provides? Or do they replace it with something else, but then it’s still a class system?

Yeah, right! You just want us to become one of those math problem characters.

Chemical_cutthroat wants 50 pints of milk, but milk only comes in 4 Litre jugs. How many jugs must they buy to make 100% milk?

Don’t give them ideas…

Respect the lore! Reeee!

You’re fuckin right aboot that, buddy.

Just fucking do it already you babies!

Technically, if there are no homeless people alive, that fixes the problem. Obviously I hope it doesn’t get to that point, but that seems to be the underlying message of the cons whenever they talk about the problem.

The more the merrier.

Just needs a little sign with “Insert billionaire head here” written on it.

Much better, thanks!

Okay, but what if they also have some ridiculous 10 gallon hat on?

Great, now I got “mmm whatcha say” stuck in my head again. Thanks buddy.

Yup, don’t disagree. However, like the other poster said, people are voting against their best interest because they’re annoyed they have to go vote. Seems shortsighted if BC ends up privatising healthcare or follows through with anything else they’ve talked about.

The Floyd one.

Damn, they be turning space gay now too? When will the madness end!?

/s~incase it wasn’t obvious~

Everything is edible if you’re brave enough.