I’m having trouble finding the one I’m thinking about (it was written for some industry org, maybe OWWA or OPWA?
Anyways, here is a comprehensive history, but it’s 181 pages: https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2273818
I’ll comment again if I find the other one. I’m sure I have it saved somewhere 😅
TL;DR: Ottawa would have sooner built an aqueduct from 31-Mile Lake than build a sewage plant. They didn’t get one until the 1960s. Toronto built it’s first (and poorly working) municipal plant in 1912 (I think?). The chief bacteriologist in Ottawa was just like, throw some chlorine at the water, you will be fine. 😬



I’m not saying this happening is okay, but the lack of context about the volume can be misleading. Rules are different in Manitoba but in Ontario plants need to notify the public when there is a spill, which is why I imagine it’s made the news before any details are available. The idea is to inform downstream water users as soon as possible.
10 millions litres is 5% of average daily flow. It’s a very small amount, and the pollition load would be similar to a few days of totally treated sewage.
This article has a bit more info on what happened: https://www.cbc.ca/news/canada/manitoba/winnipeg-sewage-spill-treatment-plant-9.7407843
I want to be clear I’m not criticising anyone. The fact that they caught it so quickly is honestly amazing. I’ve seen similar issues (that didn’t involve a spill to the environment) go undetected for like, months, because someone assumed the instrument was faulty and didn’t bother to verify.