Drunk is big fucking spectrum. She was definitely not blackout drunk. Most importantly, all the goddamn men were drunk and high too!! Did she rape them? Or is sex something a woman could never want, something men inflict upon women?

Insane take. For one, drunk is giant fucking spectrum. But more importantly, SO WERE THE MEN!!! The only reason you people don’t care is because you haven’t deconstructed the patriarchy in your mind. Sex to you is still something a woman would never really want, and that men inflict upon a woman.

So if the exact same thing happened and Jane Doe didn’t call it rape after, that fine? Same act, same level of ability to consent. In reverse, you therefore also believe all the men can now sue HER for rape? Because they decided afterwards?

I genuinely need people to explain to me how if a bunch of drunk and high PEOPLE fuck EACH OTHER, it’s only the woman that’s raped, and only the men that are responsible for any drunk actions.

Sex is something, in general, that you do together. Why the hell do you expect a bunch of smart judgement calls from men, but not from the woman? Unless, of course, you subscribe to the patriarchal norms that no woman could ever like “just sex”, and that sex is always something men “inflict” on women.

That’s only true if a stronger Russia somehow would be a better country than a strong USA. There’s absolutely FUCK ALL to suggest that’s remotely true.

It also a false dichotomy. You can hate Russias imperialism AND USAs imperialism.

That’s not shroedinger, that’s just logic. Hard concept for some people on here, it seems. For how well you understand right wing politics and tactics, it’s suprising you believe that the “left” wing would be much different.

Let’s say I need 51% of people to vote for me. I can get 41% with all the standard talking points of making things slightly less shitty. 10% I could get by shouting about the genocide in Gaza, but then I’d LOSE some from the 41%, because “I’m too extreme”. In this scenario, the leftists are responsible, AND not significant enough to pander to.

When a nazi sees a conservative and a democrat on the ballot, do you think he doesn’t vote, because the conservative didn’t call for the gassing of Jews?

You genuinely can’t be this dumb. There’s a giant difference between “blue in the white house” and “blue in power”. Yes, every bit helps, but we’ve had very few times where blue was truly in power, as in, White House, Senate, House were all blue majority. In those rare times, things did get better. Not fucking perfect, but way better.

And I still need all the haters to actually propose a real alternative that doesn’t involve wishful thinking, expecting millions to risk their life and liberty, or doesn’t sacrifice minoritized people on the altar of accelerationism. How many walmarts have you bombed recently?

Hey, so about your better idea, is it fire bombing walmarts? And are you actually going to do that?

Because I remember a tweetdocumentary about how that’s going…