If you look closely at almost any large community, you’ll find both lovely and awful people and interactions. I try to be part of the former, but I confess that I sometimes fall in with the letter. I think that’s just human nature, but we tend to notice the negative more than the positive.
- 0 posts
- 10 comments
Yes. Then the government would bail out the banks. The executives that authorised those loans would have to leave (with a huge severance) while the politicians who facilitated that rescue would end up on some well-paid advisory board.
The taxpayers, of course, foot the bill. Get a dollar, lose two.
Use it as collateral for loans, hand out that money, then disappear so he doesn’t have to pay those loans back
MBAs have systematically been drilled to view the world as numbers, rather than social or psychological dynamics. Empathy is an obstacle when your focus is on generating higher numbers.
If you estimate a project in hours of work, a shorter work-week looks like projects will take longer. Imagine you’ve planned 60h and are billing for 60h, but instead of devoting 20h per week and delivering in three weeks, your developer now only spends 16h and you’ll be delivering in four weeks instead! That’s wasting a week they could’ve spent on other projects, slow down turnaround times and essentially cut your revenue per week by 33%.
Worse, you’re also supposed to pay them 20% more per hour, so you have less revenue for more pay. You can see how that’ll cut into profits.
Never mind that the increased productivity messes with your estimate, so the same work might now get done in, say, 48h instead, keeping the same turnaround time, at the same price you were paying before. Even if you consider that, you’d also have to charge the customer more per hour of work, which seems like a tougher sell than just keeping things as they were, which everyone is already used to.
It’s an idiotic and soulless way to think about labour instead of people, and it’s neither sustainable nor really reasonable, but if the only tool you have is a calculator, everything becomes numbers.
Glad to restore some memory of youth to you ;-)
Hope it helps, or is at least an interesting read
I think this was the one:
https://wiki.linuxaudio.org/wiki/system_configuration
I added
threadirqto the launch options as described under “Using the threadirqs kernel option”, which solved it for me, but you’ll probably want to read the whole page anyway.
which is audio related
flaskbacks intensify
I’ve never has freezes, but I fought my pipewire for a long time over chopped-up audio. I believe some kernel flag for real-time interrupt handling solved the issue at last, which I found on some audio forum after three evenings’ worth of tinkering and fiddling and eventually scouring the internet when I accepted I wouldn’t figure it out on my own. IDK if it’s of any use to you, but I can dig it out if you’d like.
Technology@lemmy.world•We Regret to Inform You Chipotle Is Now Working With Palantirbyluciferofastora@feddit.orgEnglish
2 daysAntidotally
That is a very fitting typo in the context of food poisoning problems
- 4 days
Well, a bunch of venues threatened to not let him play… which I’m pretty sure he could’ve spun into a PR boost by making a public statement about it, just like all his supporting acts did. Even for those parts of his audience that doesn’t care about politics, him calling out the venue owners might direct the backlash at them instead. Hell, maybe other bands would make statements about not playing at those venues too. It would have been a bold move, but he can take the financial hit, and there’s a chance at least some venues might have backed down. It would have been the right thing to do.
Like you say, he wouldn’t even have to make a statement on genocide directly, just about freedom of speech, artistic expression or something along those lines. There have been other recent instances of artists either cancelling shows in solidarity or using the stage for a statement in support of their fellows. Even this kind of “middle of the road” take would’ve been better, and probably smarter too. Setting the precedent that venue owners can push him around can’t possibly be a sensible idea.



Thanks for the setup ;-)