Making things very obscured is not a proof.
The guy is politely saying it’s nonsense
Long term computer programmer, making my own library. American based. Far left politically. Promotes use of paper ballots. Follows news about environmental collapse, political corruption in my country, human rights, science and tech.
Making things very obscured is not a proof.
The guy is politely saying it’s nonsense
I think most local politics can have greater participation: when there are more places to hang out and socialize in that community.
It just cannot be done by staying inside, on the internet. People have to meet face to face.
Of course, it would help too if there were political movements that caught people’s attention and whose success could be measured. Trying to elect people who are less corrupt, all by itself, will not inspire many.
But could never be, because the very person who created it was not an artistic person.
I’ve known at least one who has; of course it was for different purposes, outcomes and all that.
But it’s very possible, and realistic.
Which is what makes the joke funny

quietly judge people based on what they bought
This is the reason it’s worth it. No other industry, except delivery, allows nosy people to judge so many others, safety, and without comment

Earn social credit while pouring juice
it’s a pretty inconclusive statement , and can be interpreted.
Post here when he and others say it’s correct