Enshittification, nerfed, lobotomized, whatever you want to call it, is this the beginning of the end for Claude’s highest-paying users? Who decides where frustration ends? What is your end game here?
I find it while it’s still running and document it before they can bury it. Investigating AI behavioural conditioning, OpenAI, Anthropic, Palantir, and the political networks behind AI guardrails. Surveillance architecture, AI consciousness, Five Eyes.
- 4 posts
- 1 comment
Joined 11 days ago
Cake day: October 6th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Five years of your social media just to visit the US on an ESTA, and 50,922 phone searches at the border in a single year with no suspicion needed. Part 1 of my Five Eyes series: who else gets to see it?
Peter Thiel’s Antichrist lectures call AI safety the road to control, while his fund backs OpenAI and Anthropic. His own 2004 essay explains why.
When I read that the US had proposed making ESTA visitors hand over five years of their social media, I asked myself, would I even want to go there now? Then I went looking at where all that information ends up. Part 1 of my Five Eyes series.
Fair enough. The piece is less about Claude and more about a company changing what its paying users got, on the same day it said it had only tightened limits. That should bother people whether they love AI or hate it.