
I guess they might not be able to use that film against you, so if that’s the only evidence they have you may just walk.

I guess they might not be able to use that film against you, so if that’s the only evidence they have you may just walk.

Ended up looking it up, they got the warrant by stating they were investigating an international trafficking ring. Krafts team argued that it wasn’t a international trafficking ring, it was solicitation. So all 25 men caught were dismissed. The owner of the place and the manager were both convicted of solicitation of another basically.
So “we broke the law but you didnt write the warrant to catch us breaking that law, would you really justify a warrant to catch someone soliciting prostitution”

… Why were the charges dropped if they had a video of it?

Sure, but that’s not what the policies are for. If/when someone gets injured on the job the policy is standardly they require you to take a drug test then. If you fail you were breaking policy and the injury is deemed your fault, thus taking all responsibility of paying you workers comp off the table. Happens every day across the U.S. (that said I believe you can fight it, as you aren’t always automatically eliminated if you fail the drug test, you will have an up hill battle though)
Obama signed an executive order to close Guantanamo bay. Congress signed a veto proof funding bill that kept it open. So yes both Democrats and Republicans wanted to keep it open at that time, but the “Obama admin” made it clear it was supposed to be closed.
The Senate voted 90-6 against the funds they requested to move the prisoners to actual u.s. prisons in the states.
Edit: In 2015 he vetoed another bill permanently banning the prisoners being moved to the states, congress over road him with the NDAA and sent it back with once again non-veto-able numbers