
Yeah, last i checked on 270 to win, Dems would need to win some VERY improbable Senate races to pull off the 67 needed to convict and remove both. Possible, just improbable.
If they don’t reach the 67 needed, they need to save any impeachment hearings because people are voting based on economy and having impeachment hearings will come off as out of touch, like the last time.
Instead they should focus on investigating and releasing the Epstein files, as there seems to be bipartisan support for that, and once fully released, test public sentiment on impeachment. That may be the only way to get enough votes, but the end result would be a Vance presidency, unless they can somehow tie him to it as well, which is unlikely.



Just to clarify, this law becomes active January 1st. The new congress doesn’t get sworn in until January 3rd.
As others have stated, it’s being projected that Dems take back the House and possibly the Senate, which could see a new law get signed in that reappropriates funds back into social safety net programs, though it then goes to the dipshit in command for a signature. If he vetoes, it’ll require 2/3rds of both chambers of Congress to override, which is a much taller order.
So as you are stating, people need to realize what’s fully at stake and vote. There is a pathway to some form of normalcy, 2/3rds is … possible.