Debating on the internet is like sticking your foot into a unflushed toilet.
It accomplishes nothing and now you’re burdened with useless shit.
That said, fuck AI.
True, very true. But do people really have to justify themselves with never-happening ‘if’ statements?
You don’t have to do anything, honey. You choose what grips you and where you feel obligation in this world.
- 6 days
Many people enjoy arguing with strangers on the Internet. Of those who do, quite a few don’t know when or how to stop and admit (even to themselves) that they were wrong.
- the_q@piefed.socialEnglish6 days
The problem is that you can’t extrapolate outward. You set the level of what is unreasonable, and at the same time lack the depth to understand you’re being unreasonable.
- the_q@piefed.socialEnglish6 days
Expecting the world to operate under your guidelines is unreasonable.
I’m not quite sure what you mean by that, I wasn’t imposing ‘guidelines’ just pointing out that their argument against me was meaningless.
I post 1 AI image. People say to me ‘you shouldn’t do that because if everyone did that, it would be bad’. I respond by saying that their point is not wrong, but meaningless because we all know there’s no way everyone would do it here. I’m not imposing anything — it’s them that’s trying to impose on me by trying to tell me what not to post based on a fantasy scenario


