- 17 days
Good to see they followed best practices by using a random number. At least it wasn’t a birthdate.

- 17 days
A security certificate authority from India had several of their keys deciphered because the numbers used to generate them were way too short. In fact one of them was simply the number 4. Because of this basically the entire internet has been put at risk because it’s trivially easy to forge keys from this trusted authority.
- Paulemeister@feddit.orgEnglish17 days
As I understood it a certificate authority (the thing that you trust to make sure a website is who it claims it is) used 4 as the “password” for their cryptographic key, which would make it quite easy for a malicious attacker between you and a legit website, to modify the contents, encrypt it with their own key and then send their own certificate of, looking like it came from a certificate authority that you trust, essentially enabling an attacker to break encryption. (for example an ISP could do this as all the traffic goes through them)
- 16 days
It used 4 as the cryptographic key. (CA keys are not password protected afaik)
- Paulemeister@feddit.orgEnglish16 days
yeah I wasn’t sure if they have 4 as the key or 4 in some encoding. the key being straight up 4 is crazy
- 16 days
It’s base64 encoded along with some metadata, and cryptographically hashed so all keys are the same length.
- 17 days
Its the same joke everyone else is making.
If you open the original post URL, there is an image with a post-it note reading “My password 4”. Some servers don’t show the post images sometimes, I had to open the original URL to see the picture.




