- gibmiser@lemmy.worldEnglish18 days
Lol he got me. I was checking the comments to see if he replied. Silly me didn’t think to check the OP.
- 18 days
Probably one of my favorite accounts. Taking the piss in the funniest way possible as usual.
- 18 days
I guess it depends on the metrics. They’re really good at staying submerged for a long time.
kersploosh@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
18 daysLike how every zoo is a petting zoo if you aren’t a wimp about it.
- 18 days
I snorted out loud at this one. I’m using that as a variant of yolo from now on.
- BreakerSwitch@lemmy.worldEnglish18 days
Yes, that was the claim and there are multiple reports of them being destroyed after doing WAY less, like trying to ford (ha) a river. Which is interesting because I know other electric vehicles NOT meant for that which have been used without immediately being destroyed in flooded areas (mostly motorcycles tbh).
Same thing here. EVEN IF the claim was good and the car could land like a cat every time, it would still do lasting, if not immediate damage to the vehicle.
bampop@lemmy.worldEnglish
17 daysIt’s like how some people think food delivery robots are not sex bots. I mean, not with that attitude
- 18 days
Instructions unclear. Now I’m being dragged around town to some very dissatisfied customers.
- OwOarchist@pawb.socialEnglish18 days
With a carefully prepared and calculated landing ramp, most cars could handle multiple flights.
- 18 days
Threatening SMCF with a ban is like threatening Yogi Bear with a picnic basket.
Magnum, P.I.@infosec.pubEnglish
18 daysOh lol a Mastodon screenshot. We are basically self sustainable.
- im_fine_sandy@nord.pubEnglish18 days
Is there a joke I’m missing?
OOP is OP, so if you blocked them you wouldn’t see the post?













