
Sure but it wasn’t your biology.
Personally I don’t think they’d be able to tell the difference between someone not responding and a response being lost in the mail. The USPS is notoriously unreliable and should be privatized, donchaknow.

Sure but it wasn’t your biology.
Personally I don’t think they’d be able to tell the difference between someone not responding and a response being lost in the mail. The USPS is notoriously unreliable and should be privatized, donchaknow.
You can run stuff on a little GPU, IGPU, or even just a CPU. You’ll be limited by RAM/VRAM, and obviously it’ll be slower, but it’ll work.
Yup, proxmox is great.
Note that you can’t (or rather, shouldn’t) run docker containers on proxmox. Most people run a vm and then docker inside that. And yes, I use Debian for it
You can give proxmox a docker container reference, but it’ll download and convert it to LXC, which means you can’t update the container. You’d have to update the container’s os and the app manually, or redeploy the container and reattach the storage.

They are, but only local systems. They don’t do the national network like Flock. Each PD would only have access to their own system.
Unlikely. Preventing wipe and reuse is an anti-theft measure, so you’d need to have the owner unlock and wipe it for you.

I’m not gonna say nobody, but Ed Sheeran is definitely the bigger name. Not only because he’s current, but because he’s a solo artist using his own name. I couldn’t name the members of most of the most famous bands (Pink Floyd, AC/DC, Led Zepplin) but I can easily name Elvis, Elton John, Madonna.
Immich isn’t complex, and I don’t think it requires a separate database.
Edit: just checked and technically it does, but if you use the docker compose then it deploys it automatically and you don’t have to think about it at all.
Edit2: if you really want something dead simple, yeah you could trivially write a tiny script to list and thumbnail images. I’m sure there are apache plugins for exactly this.
They don’t fuse. They’re connected, yes, but so is everything in your body.
That doesn’t look suspicious to me.

No we just think it was dumb
Literally the next to most recent post before this https://piefed.blahaj.zone/c/piracy@piefed.blahaj.zone/p/984788/how-do-you-vet-executables
You can also put it through sandboxes like joesandbox or cuckoo to try to trigger and detect a payload. But some malware will expect this and not execute.
Ultimately, judge your own risk tolerance by how much you trust the source, how much you want the software, what kind of systems protection you have in place (antivirus, antimalware, permissions control, backups), and how much you can afford to have your system compromised.

offline
web server
huh

His first example came from the same summit. That morning, McKenzie said, a filmmaker had told the audience that his film was banned in Egypt but that people could still see it there thanks to piracy.
When dealing with this type of banned content and censorship, piracy is put in a different light, apparently with filmmakers praising it. However, when poor people pirate, they face legal issues, McKenzie said. He called the industry’s approach “a bit schizophrenic” with “dual standards.”
Not really a double standard as most people use the term. If it’s not available by standard means, it’s not really piracy.

This. I’m all for competition and innovation, but this is subsidized by the Chinese government to exploit a lack of manufacturing in other countries.
If you’ve heard about how food or clothing donations harm local farmers and weavers, same principle. We should be encouraging domestic production around the world, not allowing one country to undercut everyone else.

Bad news, Apple is trying to figure out how to add cameras to airpods.

Video is not legal in public in some countries. In Germany, for example, it is illegal to film people on the street.
If you’re recording a building or something, and there are incidental people, that’s fine, but with these glasses you’re walking around pointing the camera directly at people.
Regardless, even where it’s legal, most people wouldn’t know how to recognize them. They’re not obvious. Which is how people have gotten away with wearing them to film children changing, and the giveaway was that the guy was following and staring at the children, not the glasses. https://www.wcvb.com/article/mark-sullivan-new-charges-boston-common/73790219

Does it actually work?
That hasn’t stopped them yet.