I’m really hating this trend of passing laws to prevent any future regulations of things.

Like the 10 years “you can’t touch AI” with your laws proposal.

Ohh you rolled snake eyes, sorry lose 12 hours and try again

Soooooo did daddy actually want some sausage?

What about Gwengoolie?

The innuendo in Scared Stiff is amazing. It’s one of my favorite games.

I think an explosion box would be the best. (I am anti death penalty)

Im assuming you’re not just being a smart ass, and will give you a real answer:

The human body can be extremely resilient. If you are required to kill someone but not allowed to intentionally prolong the death or inflict unnecessary suffering, you must be really precise. The law is written that way to prevert torturing someone before their death.

In this botched execution, witnesses said her arm was purple and there were 7 sites that needles were used. Imagine attempting to injected a substance into someone’s bloodstream 7 times and failing each time. All those liquids have to go somewhere, so it just absolutely ruins everything it touches loose in the body. She complained that her arm felt like it was going to burst. That to me is unnecessary suffering.

If they really wanted to kill someone nearly instantly they would have some type of blast chamber and use enough explosive that someone would basically be exploded in fractions of a second. But somehow that seems messy and barbaric compared to torturing someone like the state did last night.