Except for the fact that I very clearly said there were no features that I found interesting? And also, avoid anti-features doesn’t seem particularly silly to me.
If you or anyone else wants to use cachy, that’s great, but it’s not for me.
ShutUpWesley
- 0 posts
- 10 comments
Joined 5 months ago
Cake day: April 19th, 2026
You are not logged in. If you use a Fediverse account that is able to follow users, you can follow this user.
Sure, but if that’s a selling point, an advantage as we were discussing, then it’s obviously the wrong distro for me. I’m sure it’s great for others.
“Graphical package manager included out of the box”, ahh I see, this is not the distro for me.
I honestly can’t see a single advantage of Cachy over Endevour, as the performance boosts seem to have no real effect on any if my hardware.
- 6 days
Set up some *arrs and never worry about dredging through indexer sites ever again.
7 daysI used to use watchtower. But then it killed a few services that had pre-update instructions, and I learned my lesson.
It just gives me a GUI to see when a service needs an update, and a button to perform it, then I just backup and read the update notes before I do it.
Definitely checkout dockhand. It gives a single dashboard for all your hosts. I primarily use it for updating containers and checking logs, but it does quite a bit more. You can even point it towards your compose files and it can edit them in with a GUI, but I haven’t played with that yet.
Man, I didn’t even know dockhand had a HA integration, I know what I’m doing when I get home.
Dropped portainer years ago. Managing some compose files isn’t hard, and Dockhand is better for managing updates
That is the beauty of the Archiverse.