• 4 posts
  • 5 comments
Joined 7 days ago
Cake day: October 27th, 2026
  • Yes and no, mostly no, but it’s open to interpretation.

    https://stereogum.com/2513749/tom-morello-clarifies-he-does-vote-just-not-for-corporate-democrats/news

    Short version, he bragged about not voting for Harris, with the nuance (which is so easily lost in today’s society) that she was all but guaranteed to win California, so his protest vote did not, on it’s own, risk contributing to Donald Trump’s second term.

    The flip side of that nuance is that his rhetoric about the subject, without providing context, may have discouraged voting in swing states that could have helped Trump.

    His follow-up statements clarified his stance, including the quote I provided.

    His behavior overall was messy, but that quote holds up nicely on its own.

  • It’s California. There’s an open primary, I happen to live in one of the few red parts and for one spot the top two vote getters in the primary were Republican.

    They didn’t run unopposed, the opposition just all failed to get a consensus. CA’s system isn’t perfect, but realistically a Democrat doesn’t have a chance in this particular district, maybe the less evil Republican has a shot though.

    US elections involve some compromise. Vote for your ideal candidate in the primary, but after that there’s generally only 2 people who have any shot at a given seat, and throwing away your vote in protest helps the worst candidates succeed. That’s why elections spend so much money on attack ads - they want you feeling discouraged.

  • Reposting my own comment here:

    I live somewhere with 2 Republicans on the ballot for one seat with no write in line.

    I could have not voted at all on that item, but that wouldn’t have helped anybody but the worst of the two candidates.

    I poured through more interviews and candidate statements from these two trashy people than any other candidate I voted for, just to find the one that was the least evil.

    I still hate them both, but I voted for one to try and stem the bleeding because that’s how our Democracy works.

    And adding a quote from Rage Against the Machine’s Tom Morello:

    But in any and every contested race, as my mom Mary Morello always said, we have to fight the fascist every which way we can, recognizing that even if there’s but an inch of difference between two candidates, there are a lot of vulnerable people who could be greatly harmed in that inch.

The National Park Service is drawing the funding from visitor entrance fees across the country.

The Trump administration has budgeted $1.2 million for removing trees at East Potomac Golf Links, according to documents reviewed by The Washington Post, as the president seeks to redevelop the beloved D.C. course.

Here’s a spicy one for a world averse to compromise…

The Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act of 2026 (BAAJA) could dramatically reshape America’s energy system. And the bill’s supporters plan to pass it during the House and Senate’s lame-duck session — the months between next week’s elections and the new Congress’s arrival.

The bill is long and complex, revising the rules governing everything from how ocean-powered turbines are licensed to what some geothermal plants must pay in royalties.

That said, the legislation’s fundamental aim is simple: to make building all forms of energy infrastructure easier.

The BAAJA has united fossil fuel companies and green energy firms in its favor — while cleaving the climate movement in two.

• The Bipartisan American Affordability and Jobs Act would make it easier to build new power plants and transmission lines.

• The bill benefits fossil fuel companies, but it would likely do even more to accelerate the growth of clean energy.

• Environmentalists are divided over the bill, with critics warning that it would weaken important environmental protections.

• The bill has one potentially serious flaw that Congress should fix. But with that change, it would be a win for the climate and consumers alike.

Some climate hawks contend that the legislation pares back vital environmental regulations, while clearing the way for new gas pipelines and power plants that will drive up America’s emissions. “This is not the permitting deal that we were promised,” Jeremy Symons, president of the Center for Energy and Environmental Analysis, told me, citing its “historic environmental protection rollbacks.”

Others insist that the bill is a net-win for decarbonization. In their account, permitting reforms will do more to facilitate a buildout of green energy than to lock in America’s dependence on fossil fuels.

“Fossil is the incumbent technology and fuel mix,” Jane Flegal, a senior fellow at the center-left Searchlight Institute, said. “A system that makes it easier for everyone to build should advantage the nonincumbent.”

Curious of other folks thoughts. Personally I think Democrats can revise and pass something better after the midterms, but it’ll likely get vetoed. Is it better to do nothing and wait until after the 2028 election or compromise now?

Finnish police opened a criminal investigation Thursday into Google’s work on a planned data center in northern Finland after the company cleared hundreds of acres of forest without completing required environmental reviews. The investigation adds to mounting scrutiny of Google’s $1.5 billion investment in artificial intelligence infrastructure in Finland, where the company’s expansion plans have…