Pika@sh.itjust.worksEnglish
21 hoursFor perspective, the watch division makes between $35 to $40 billion annually.
- Squizzy@lemmy.worldEnglish17 hours
Crazy, I dont think it is all because of the haptics though. This seems like a noteworthy amount for them
- kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish16 hours
By the time Apple pays this, assuming they do. They will have made at least that much in extra profits from the original $5.7 billion by investing it.
- FauxLiving@lemmy.worldEnglish12 hours
Sure, but they also have to pay interest on the balance starting at the moment the judgement was entered.
- kbobabob@lemmy.dbzer0.comEnglish4 hours
Only having to pay the interest of 5.7 billion sounds like a better deal, no?
- latetolemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish19 hours
It would be cheaper to just assasinate the lawyers and the other party.
- reddig33@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
How is this good news? Haptic feedback has existed since the 1970s. This patent should be invalid. timochka@lemmy.zipEnglish
4 hoursThe patent is not on haptic feedback. The patent is on a very specific means of implementing haptic feedback using ferrofluids and electromagnetic actuators that it is claimed (and Apple deemed it good enough to copy, so presumably truly) allows for both a smaller implementation than typical mechanical haptic feedback (i.e. the off-balance-flywheel approach of phones of old), while also allowing for low- or zero- noise compared to “speaker or piezo” based haptic feedback.
There are a lot of shit patents in the world, but on a surface reading at least this seems sufficiently novel that I don’t see why it should be invalid. One also presumes that if Apple had any grounds to invalidate it on prior-art they would have done so.
- reddig33@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
So I looked into this and you are right and I am wrong. Deleting my previous posts since there’s more to this case than just haptics.
- 17 hours
Even if it’s like catching Al capone on tax fraud, it’s still good to get the baddie.
- reddig33@lemmy.worldEnglish2 hours
Rewarding a patent troll is never a good thing. It just means no one will be able to use haptic feedback without paying a toll.- 12 hours
Are they really a patent troll though? It’s apparently a headphone company.
- Spur4383@lemmy.worldEnglish12 hours
They have one headphone license for one model from crossair, that is worth less money that what they spent on lawyers for this trial. They are a patent troll.
- latetolemmy@lemmy.worldEnglish19 hours




