Gsus4@programming.devEnglish
6 daysso they also know that it is not the artificial intelligence they try to sell, it is aggregated information. An improvement on google and a new way to structure and query existing information…but marketing and the manageriat has to eat everything.
- Johanno@feddit.orgEnglish5 days
It is, but not because Google was bad, it is because Google was good and got worse for years.
Ai is now as good as 2016 Google.
Gsus4@programming.devEnglish
5 daysOk, when it doesnt hallucinate, it is an improvement :D when it does, back you go to google to check :/
It is a new alternative to search engines that trades wide aggregation of content for accuracy and attribution.
- gnutrino@programming.devEnglish6 days
Depends, population growth means it’s possible in raw terms even if it doesn’t compare per capita.
- mrgoosmoos@lemmy.caEnglish5 days
compared to the total sum of all slavery ever? probably not. but as a single event or sum over a small period of time… yeah
- CosmoNova@lemmy.worldEnglish5 days
Read a comment about Nuremberg trials for the rich and AI company execs the other day. This made me think of it.



